Sunday, July 10, 2005

Bye-bye Wasserman

The university administration continues to move agressively to close the Paul Wasserman Library. Below is the text of the latest memo.


Subject:
Wasserman Announcement
From:
Charles Lowry
Date:
Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:59:17 -0400
To:
UM LIBRARY STAFF

All,

I am pleased to provide this initial information for CLIS and Libraries faculty and staff concerning the transfer of services and responsibilities for the Wasserman Library to the Administration of the Dean of Libraries. This is a joing announcement that is concurrently being made in CLIS. It has been arrived at after discussions between myself, Dean Preece, and the Provost. Dean Preece has consulted with her facult and staff and I with the LEC.

The first consideration of this change occurred over a year ago with a report from a committee appointed by Dean Dearstyne that recommended administrative relocation. More recently, discussions between Deans Preece and Lowry and Provost Destler have focused on achieving additional goals of centralizing library resources to provide improved services and releasing space in CLIS for research and student projects.

There are many details to be worked out in order to continue providing robust library information services to CLIS faculty and students. This will remain the primary goal of the planning and implementation process. What follows is not a plan, but the outline of the basic framework within which the planning groups will work. The key points are as follows:

* A planning group, comprising CLIS and Libraries faculty and staff,
will be put together to work out the details of the transfer of
collections from their present location in Hornbake to McKeldin
Library. Karen Patterson and Tim Hackman will be members of the
planning group and will work throughout the planning process with
Dean Preece and the CLIS faculty to be certain that the planning
process has optimal results for CLIS faculty and students.
Coincidentally, work is already underway to measure shelf
availability in McKeldin Library and this will support the work of
the planning group, which will be appointed and charged in August.
* These general guidelines will be used in planning for the merger
of collections
o Until planning is completed we will not know precisely when
the collection merger will occur. Given the challenges of
moving a collection that is equal to a full year's growth in
McKeldin’s holdings, the planning group will have to work on
at least two potential dates when such a move may
occur-January or June 2006. However, the target date will be
January.
o Some weeding of duplicates will take place.
o Some materials will be put in off-site shelving where they
are retrievable on a 48 hour basis.
o A few materials may be kept in CLIS for purposes of instruction.
o Most of the Wasserman collection should go to McKeldin and
will be interfiled based on the LC classification scheme.
o The Children’s collection may be kept in the Dewey Decimal
Classification as a separate collection in McKeldin.
o Collection development resources provided by CLIS and UML
will be combined and over time the acquisition funds
supporting CLIS programs will grow with the aim of providing
better service to CLIS.
o The one-time cost of the move will be provided the Provost.
o There will be some funds for refurbishment in CLIS.
* Karen Patterson and Tim Hackman will be transferred to the Library
Faculty, where they will benefit from the Libraries promotion and
permanent status system. Both will remain physically located in
the Wasserman Library until the collections are merged.
* Karen's position will be assigned to the Libraries Social Sciences
Team for the specific support of CLIS students and faculty. Some
collaborative work has already occurred between Wasserman and the
Social Sciences Team. During the transition of collections and
services, Karen's time will be devoted solely to the UML support
mission for CLIS and general CLIS support.
* Tim’s assignment is not yet settled. His work responsibilities may
be distributed in several Public Services units that can provide
support to CLIS until a permanent assignment is identified. Once
Tim has a permanent assignment, his current position will be
reallocated for a different function within CLIS.


Throughout this process the aim will be to provide improved library support to CLIS by keeping the collection more up to date. Those functions which don’t transfer to McKeldin, such as overseeing technical support in classrooms, will be supported in other ways within CLIS (e.g., by newly appointed technical support staff).

In this initial memo we have focused on issues of concern to both CLIS and Library faculty and staff. Separate discussions will also be needed for each group as we move forward with the planning process.

Charles

9 Comments:

Blogger Kevin said...

Dear Surly Student,

I couldn't agree more!

Thanks for writing!!

2:36 PM  
Blogger Katy Newton Lawley said...

I'm a doctoral student and Master's alum of CLIS. My stomach literally turned when I heard this news, which is a blow to my personal, everyday routine as well as to my conceptualization of CLIS as a community with open communication and mutual respect throughout the organization.

Since Dean Preece (and before her, Acting Dean Dearstyne) failed to initiate dialog with the student body, I must assume that she went into meetings with the Provost unwilling and/or unprepared to fight on our behalf for Wasserman. This troubles me. Deeply.

I am also insulted by the perky tone of Dean Lowry's memo. This is not a process that should be described with any corporatespeak euphemisms. It is a solemn occasion, which will disrupt (1) the personal and professional lives of Karen and Tim, (2) the research habits of students and staff and faculty, (3) social and collaborative chance meetings among students, and (4) the marketability of CLIS to prospective students. I could go on about each of these at length, but those who use and appreciate Wasserman know, I think, what I'm talking about.

Karen and Tim and the GAs have always done such a great job providing friendly, professional, and specialized services in a convenient and comfortable environment. I beg CLIS not to push them out, although my pleas feel useless and muffled, since the decision has already been made.

3:20 PM  
Blogger Kevin said...

Dear Katy,

Thanks for writing. Please encourage others to post their opinions, whatever their take on these issues. CLIS is failing itself and its students by not building a learning space that can support hones intellectual debate about its own mission and vision.

Pass it on!

4:24 PM  
Blogger Kevin said...

Dear Emily,

Yeah, it's pretty amazing to me the secrecy about it all. It suggests, though does not necessitate, the lack of clarity among those making the decision.

Spread the word, let's keep the dialogue going.

More later!

10:14 PM  
Blogger cjmslmc said...

As a former MLS student and current PhD student at CLIS, I am more than a little upset about this situation.

We have questions:

Why weren’t the students involved in discussions surrounding the fate of Wasserman? Isn’t that why we have student collegium representatives?

Why hasn’t the administration responded (officially or otherwise) to students’ concerns now that the news is out?

Will there be a new space for student interaction/networking/community building? The lounge as it exists is not sufficient.

Will services provided by Wasserman staff be continued? If so, to what extent? Will Karen’s new position at McKeldin as the CLIS representative include other non-CLIS related duties “as assigned”?

What is the new space created in place of Wasserman to be used for? Computer science or library science research? This question is directly related to how the administration/leaders in the college envision the future of CLIS (and maybe library schools in general). Is this indicative of the “you can get everything online” or the “do you really need a masters degree for that” mentality? What is the slated direction for CLIS?

Where are the answers?

2:51 PM  
Blogger cjmslmc said...

As a former CLIS MLS student and current PhD student here, I am more than a little upset about this situation.

We have questions:

Why weren’t the students involved in discussions surrounding the fate of Wasserman? Isn’t that why we have student collegium representatives?

Why hasn’t the administration responded (officially or otherwise) to students’ concerns now that the news is out?

Will there be a new space for student interaction/networking/community building? The lounge as it exists is not sufficient.

Will services provided by Wasserman staff be continued? If so, to what extent? Will Karen’s new position at McKeldin as the CLIS representative include other non-CLIS related duties “as assigned”?

What is the new space created in place of Wasserman to be used for? Computer science or library science research? This question is directly related to how the administration/leaders in the college envision the future of CLIS (and maybe library schools in general). Is this indicative of the “you can get everything online” or the “do you really need a masters degree for that” mentality? What is the slated direction for CLIS?

Where are the answers?

2:52 PM  
Blogger Kevin said...

Dear Kara,

Thanks for writing, first. I think that we're getting a range of people and a range of details here, so keep it comin'.

As aside, I keep hearing the word "inevitable" or some form of it. I wonder how set in stone it really is, if you look at the language of the memo. The word "planning" keeps coming up. Sounds curious to me.

Keep making those great points!

2:52 PM  
Blogger Kevin said...

Dear Sheri,

Yes! I think the opportunities for improved team/trust building and creative problem solving are myriad in this recent Wasserman flap. We learn about management techniques and this is clearly a model to avoid.

Best,
Kevin

2:54 PM  
Blogger Kevin said...

Dear Malissa,

Wow. Well written letter. There's so much to take in here.....

Thanks for writing. Speak up and out often!

10:31 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home